| Union Pacific Railroad Company Sale of Lands before Patents Granted [Project to bring Fraud Forward] | |||
| Title Policy amount considered trade price for current resident to trade labor value [for claim and Noticing fraud] for Land Patent in 50/50 trade with Land Patent Holder(s). | |||
| Title Company [commitment to Trade Agreement ss Public LAW] | Claimant/Resident 5S67W Section 21 | Claimant/Resident (not 5S67W Section 21) | |
| First Notice | 20% Discount to claim total as trade for Land Patent to Section 5S67W Section 21 Claims. Applied only to Total Trade price for Land Patent holder side of the 50/50 trade [labor to claimant ratio]. Claimant side dependent on when resident makes commitment to trade with Land Patent holder as said 50/50 split. | 10% discount [claimant side only. See Title company column for Land Patent holder’s discount applied to Land Patent holder side of said split.] applied to claim against Title Company if Title Company acknowledges claim prior to Second Notice and claimant or claimant Agent [as State National] provides proof of intent to become a State National. State National status is a necessary requirement for granting Land Patent in trade for value received. | Not Applicable |
| Second Notice | 10% Discount to claim as trade for Land Patent to Section 5S67W Section 21 Claims. Applied only to Total Trade price for Land Patent holder side of the trade | 20% discount [claimant side only. See Title company column for Land Patent holder’s discount applied to Land Patent holder side of said split.] applied to claim against Title Company if Title Company acknowledges claim prior to Second Notice and claimant or claimant Agent [as State National] provides proof of intent to become a State National. State National status is a necessary requirement for granting Land Patent in trade for value received. | Not Applicable |
| Third Notice | No Discount to claims as trade for Land Patent to Section 5S67W Section 21 Claims. Claims are extended to all fraudulent chains of title agaainst title company failing to reach a trade agreement by Third Notice. Claims extend outside the limitation to said section 21. See column for residents outside said Section. | Not applicable. This agreement and trade is only applicable to the population of residents that are told the truth and find a State National to file a claim against the fraud described. Piracy does not change ownership. Rent at 1/7 total value of residence per year paid to Patent holder(s). | Under the claims and Notices to UP, no claims are applicable to residents ouside Section 21 unless the Title Company fails to accept a trade agreement to honor claims of Section 21 by Third Notice. |
| Both Title Companies [Noticed first as a class] and residents [Noticed Last with some exceptions] to be Noticed to abide by Public LAW claims by Land Patent Holder(s). Claims against Title Company policy have a statutory limitation of two or three years from Notice or discovery of defect in chain of title to file a claim. | |||
Example 1: Parcel 1 is located within Section 21 making the first two columns of the table applicable. Parcel 1 was purchased for $1,000,000. The title policy is for the same amount. In the 50/50 split $500k is value for bringing the fraud forward. In this example the claim is made on Title Company A. Since Title Company A responded to Notice upon service of Second Notice, the Land Patent Grantor discount is 10% as per the second row of the Table. The value to the Grantors [Combolisk Project] is $450,000. The claimant filed intent to become a State National upon Second Notice making the discount 20% or $100,000, The claim is thus for a total of $850,000 with $450,000 due to Grantors and $400,000 due to claimant. The example is dependent upon the claim being made within two years, the claimant becoming a State National and all the Parties agreeing to Public LAW.
:Example 2: Parcel 5 is located in Section 27. The Title Policy was issued by Title Company A. Since Title Company A responded timely in Example 1, there is no valid claim. The Claimant is denied as the original Chain of Title holds the UP sale to be perfected.
Example 3: Parcel 6 is in Section 21. The title policy is for $500,000. The policy was issued by Title Company F. The title company has not made a trade agreement to discount claims and has been served Third Notice. The claimant files claim for the full $500,000. Under the 50/50 split, the claimant and the Land Patent holders split the claim.
Example 4: Parcel 7 is in Section 21. The title policy is for $600,000. the Title Policy was created by Title Company E. Title Company E responded before Second Notice. The claimant The claimant does not want to reside on the property or become a State National. There is no contract with the claimant. The claimant may claim the full $600,000 and leave the parcel. Claimant has been Noticed three times. As a dead asset of a U.S. Corporation, the claimant may be denied any other locations on the Land within any State. The Residency Act allowing residency on the Land applies to living men and [wo]men, not dead assets.
